[Dibbler] [Bug report]Bug in Server which receives layerdRelay-agents Relay-Forward message

[Hideshi.Enokihara at jp.yokogawa.com]

Hello Tomasz,

I've confrimed the snapshot works well!

Thank you for your cooperation!

Best regards,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Enokihara, Hideshi (Hideshi.Enokihara at jp.yokogawa.com) 
> Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 11:11 AM
> To: tomasz.mrugalski at klub.com.pl; dibbler at klub.com.pl
> Subject: Re: [Dibbler] [Bug report]Bug in Server which 
> receives layerdRelay-agents Relay-Forward message
> 
> Hello Tomasz,
> 
> Sorry for my delay response.
> We have been in national holidays for about 1 week.
> 
> Thank so much you for your fixing the bug.
> 
> Now, I'm checking the behavior.
> I will let you know if the snapshot works for you or not
> 
> Thanks again,
> Hideshi
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tomasz Mrugalski [mailto:thomson at klub.com.pl]
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 6:46 AM
> > To: Dibbler users list
> > Subject: Re: [Dibbler] [Bug report]Bug in Server which 
> receives layerd 
> > Relay-agents Relay-Forward message
> > 
> > On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 somebody known as 
> > Hideshi.Enokihara at jp.yokogawa.com wrote:
> > 
> > > I'm using dibbler as server in following topology.
> > >
> > > Client------network1-------Relay Agent1-----network2--------Relay 
> > > Agnet2------Server
> > >
> > > Cleint:Windows Vista
> > > Relay Agent1:Sourceforge DHCPv6
> > > Relay Agent2:WIDE-DHCPv6
> > > Server:dibbler
> > >
> > > In this topology,
> > > Client sends a Solict, then Relay Agent1 relays this
> > messate to Relay
> > > Agnet2.
> > > Relay Anget2 sent Relay-Forward Solicit message to ff05::1:3.
> > > After that, Server sends a Relay-Reply message.
> > >
> > > But the Relay-Reply message is malformed.
> > > The message does not include layed Relay message.
> > > Please refer attached file, No.25.
> > >
> > > I would like a patch for this.
> > > Could someone help me, please?
> > Ok, it took some time, but I've got this issue fixed. I 
> have prepared 
> > a snapshot. You can download it here:
> > http://klub.com.pl/dhcpv6/snapshots/2007-05-01-relay-fix/
> > 
> > Right now server is able to handle requests sent via 2 relays and 
> > properly generates answer. Also relays properly handle traffic from 
> > other relays.
> > 
> > As for homogenous environment (e.g. non-dibber DHCPv6 server
> > + dibbler relay + dibbler clients) - the main cause of
> > problem was that dibbler relay always placed interface-id option at 
> > the end of the message.
> > Right now I have implemented new configuration parameter, 
> so sysadmin 
> > can define, where interface-id option should be placed. 
> > Unofortunately, that is not documented yet.
> > 
> > Please let me know if that snapshot works for you or not.
> > 
> > Ok, I hope that one is fixed. The next thing is a prefix delegation 
> > problem reported on the dibbler-devel.
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > -- 
> > Tomasz Mrugalski,              | "I think there is a world 
> > market for     |
> > thomson(at)klub(dot)com(dot)pl |  about five computers."      
> >             |
> >                                 |     Thomas J. Watson 
> > (Chairman, IBM) 1943|
> > _______________________________________________
> > http://klub.com.pl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dibbler
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> http://klub.com.pl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dibbler
>